Certified - AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner

In the realm of AWS cost optimization, Savings Plans and Dedicated Hosts provide two distinct but complementary strategies. While Savings Plans focus on optimizing compute costs through flexible long-term commitments, Dedicated Hosts offer businesses the ability to reserve physical hardware for specific compliance, licensing, and isolation needs. These two options help businesses balance flexibility with control. Understanding when and how to use these options is crucial for making the most out of your AWS investment. Both tools are designed to reduce the overall cloud expenditure, but they do so in fundamentally different ways, catering to different use cases.
Savings Plans offer a flexible approach to cost savings by committing to a certain amount of compute usage over one or three years. The key idea behind Savings Plans is to offer substantial discounts for long-term usage, applied across a variety of services. Compute Savings Plans cover a broad range of AWS compute services, including EC2, AWS Lambda, and AWS Fargate. These plans allow you to switch between instance families, sizes, regions, and operating systems, offering the flexibility to adapt to changing needs while still benefiting from significant savings. This is ideal for companies with fluctuating workloads or those that may need to scale quickly across different compute services.
In contrast, EC2 Instance Savings Plans are more specific. They apply only to a particular EC2 instance family within a specific region. This more focused commitment allows for a higher discount rate but comes with less flexibility. For example, if your workloads are stable and predictable, using EC2 Instance Savings Plans can be the right choice to achieve maximum savings, as long as you are willing to commit to a specific family of instances and regions. The narrower scope of EC2 Instance Savings Plans provides more predictability and higher savings, but organizations must be confident in their long-term resource needs to fully leverage the plan.
The commitment unit of Savings Plans is based on the hourly cost, which means you are committing to pay a set amount per hour over the term of the plan. This can be thought of as the "commitment meter" that measures how much AWS expects you to use. By committing to a certain hourly coverage, AWS rewards you with discounts. The more you commit, the higher the discount. However, it’s essential to track utilization closely—if you commit to more than you use, you might end up paying for capacity you don’t need, diminishing the effectiveness of the plan. Conversely, if you don’t commit enough, you may still end up paying higher on-demand prices for any usage that exceeds your commitment.
Savings Plans offer several term options—typically one or three years—each with different payment choices. You can opt to pay upfront, partially upfront, or on a monthly basis. Each payment option influences the level of savings you receive. The all-upfront payment offers the highest discount, as you are committing your funds at the beginning, which reduces AWS’s financial risk. Partially upfront offers some savings, but you still retain some flexibility in your cash flow. Monthly payments provide the most flexibility but at the lowest discount. Your choice of payment method should be aligned with your cash flow situation and the degree to which you can predict your future AWS usage.
In practice, Savings Plans are typically most effective when used for steady, predictable workloads. For example, a web application with a stable compute load that runs consistently every month would benefit greatly from committing to a Savings Plan. Start by assessing your baseline usage—the typical hourly EC2 usage across your instances—and build your plan from there. Over time, you may scale your usage or adjust your plans based on your evolving needs, but the key is to base your commitment on a steady baseline to start with.
Once you have purchased a Savings Plan, it’s important to continuously track utilization and effective rate to understand how well the plan is working for your needs. AWS provides a variety of tools to help monitor your usage against the committed levels, including Cost Explorer and the Cost and Usage Report (CUR). By keeping an eye on how much you are using versus your commitment, you can avoid under-committing or over-committing, adjusting as your usage patterns change. Tracking also ensures that you maximize the financial benefit of your commitment, making sure that no committed hours go unused.
As usage patterns shift over time, it’s important to modify your Savings Plan posture. For instance, if you initially overcommitted to an instance family or region, and your usage begins to lean towards a different family, you should reassess your plan and adjust it. Savings Plans provide the flexibility to make changes, but the longer you wait to adjust, the more you may lose out on potential savings. Proactively modifying your plan helps maintain a balance between financial commitment and real-world usage, ensuring that your cloud costs remain optimized.
Now, turning to Dedicated Hosts, these offer an entirely different way to optimize AWS costs. A Dedicated Host is a physical server that you reserve for your workloads, giving you full control over the underlying hardware. This option is ideal for organizations that need to meet strict compliance or licensing requirements, as it allows for better control over the physical resources your instances run on. For example, you may have licensing agreements that require you to map your software licenses to physical cores or sockets, and Dedicated Hosts enable this mapping by giving you direct control over hardware placement.
The use of Dedicated Hosts offers several benefits over standard EC2 instances. One of the primary benefits is isolation—since you have control over the physical server, your instances are the only ones running on that host, which helps meet security or compliance standards. If your business operates in a regulated industry, such as finance or healthcare, where sensitive data must be kept isolated, Dedicated Hosts provide the physical isolation required to meet those needs. Additionally, for workloads that require BYOL (Bring Your Own License), Dedicated Hosts allow you to optimize licensing costs, ensuring that you are not paying for unused software licenses.
The distinction between Dedicated Hosts and Dedicated Instances is important to understand. Both options offer isolation, but Dedicated Hosts give you full control over placement, mapping specific instances to physical servers. Dedicated Instances, on the other hand, run on hardware that is isolated but is still part of a shared fleet of EC2 hosts. Dedicated Hosts are more flexible, especially for users with complex licensing requirements or those that need more control over instance placement. This level of control makes Dedicated Hosts the preferred option when compliance or operational isolation is a top priority.
Capacity considerations and placement play an important role when using Dedicated Hosts. Unlike other AWS resources, where instances can be placed dynamically, Dedicated Hosts require careful planning. Capacity reservations ensure that the required resources are available when needed, and placement groups allow users to control how instances are placed within the host to meet specific performance needs. Dedicated Hosts are not designed for short-term flexibility—they require a more deliberate, long-term commitment to ensure that capacity is always available when needed, making them suitable for predictable, high-stakes workloads.
Another essential aspect of Dedicated Hosts is the cost signals and governance tagging. When managing these physical servers, accurate cost allocation and tracking are crucial. By tagging resources appropriately, organizations can ensure that costs are properly allocated to the right departments, projects, or teams. This visibility is particularly important in large organizations where multiple teams may be sharing a set of hosts. Effective tagging practices ensure that financial reporting reflects the usage and operational priorities, providing both clarity and accountability.
For more cyber related content and books, please check out cyber author dot me. Also, there are other prepcasts on Cybersecurity and more at Bare Metal Cyber dot com.
When selecting between Compute Savings Plans and EC2 Instance Savings Plans, the decision largely depends on the flexibility needed for the workload. Compute Savings Plans are ideal for organizations with workloads that may change or scale rapidly. This plan applies to a wide range of compute services, including EC2 instances, Fargate, and Lambda. This broad coverage allows for flexibility in adapting to new instance types or scaling workloads across services. For example, if you are running microservices in AWS Fargate today but anticipate switching to EC2 instances as your workload grows, Compute Savings Plans ensure that you maintain savings regardless of the specific compute service. This flexibility is especially valuable for dynamic environments with unpredictable patterns.
In contrast, EC2 Instance Savings Plans apply to specific EC2 instance families in particular regions, offering higher discounts than Compute Savings Plans but with less flexibility. These plans are most suitable for steady-state workloads that require long-term commitment to a particular instance type. For example, if your workload involves running high-performance EC2 instances with a consistent usage pattern, EC2 Instance Savings Plans may provide more savings in the long term. However, the trade-off is that you are locked into a specific instance family and region, which limits flexibility but provides more predictable savings. Choosing between these two types of Savings Plans requires a careful assessment of how predictable your workload is.
To optimize your savings, it’s essential to forecast your usage patterns based on historical data. Using recent baselines—such as the previous few months of EC2 usage or Lambda invocations—you can estimate how much you are likely to use in the future. This will help you determine the correct commitment level for a Savings Plan. For example, if your EC2 usage has been relatively stable over the past six months, you may choose to commit to a Savings Plan that reflects that usage. On the other hand, if you expect significant growth, you may want to consider a larger commitment to take advantage of the deeper discounts.
Before committing to a Savings Plan, it’s critical to rightsize your instances. Rightsizing ensures that the resources you purchase align with actual usage, avoiding overcommitment. Running instances at higher sizes than needed wastes money, so ensuring that your instances match the workload’s requirements is crucial. AWS provides tools like Trusted Advisor and Cost Explorer to help you monitor utilization and identify underused instances. By rightsizing your instances and adjusting as needed, you maximize the benefit of your Savings Plan commitment and prevent the waste of unutilized resources.
As usage patterns shift, it’s also important to monitor drift and take corrective action. Cloud environments are dynamic, and a Savings Plan that worked well for one year may no longer be appropriate the next year if usage patterns change. Regularly reviewing your usage and modifying your Savings Plan ensures that your commitment level remains accurate. AWS provides utilization tracking in Cost Explorer, so you can monitor whether your committed hours are being fully used. If you find that your actual usage is lower than expected, you can adjust your commitment or switch between Savings Plans to better align with your current needs.
While Savings Plans provide flexibility, Dedicated Hosts offer control and isolation, making them an ideal choice for workloads that require strict compliance, licensing, or isolation requirements. Dedicated Hosts are physical servers that you reserve and control, ensuring that your instances run on dedicated hardware. This physical isolation is especially important for organizations with BYOL (Bring Your Own License) requirements, as it allows for precise license management. For example, Microsoft SQL Server licenses are often tied to physical cores, and by using Dedicated Hosts, organizations can ensure that their license allocations align with AWS’s EC2 instance placement.
In addition to compliance and licensing requirements, Dedicated Hosts offer strong isolation benefits. By dedicating an entire physical server to your workloads, you can ensure that no other customers’ workloads are running on the same hardware. This isolation is crucial for security-sensitive environments where regulatory standards require dedicated infrastructure. If your organization operates in a regulated industry, such as healthcare or finance, Dedicated Hosts may be necessary to meet compliance standards that demand complete control over the hardware running sensitive workloads.
When choosing between Dedicated Hosts and Dedicated Instances, the distinction lies in the level of control. While both provide hardware isolation, Dedicated Hosts give you direct control over instance placement and hardware features, including socket and core mapping. This level of control allows organizations to better manage compliance and licensing, while Dedicated Instances offer isolation but do not allow for granular control over the placement of instances. For workloads requiring specific hardware configurations, Dedicated Hosts are the better option, while Dedicated Instances can suffice for less complex use cases where isolation is the primary requirement.
Capacity considerations and placement are important factors when managing Dedicated Hosts. AWS allows you to create capacity reservations, ensuring that sufficient resources are available when needed. Additionally, placement groups can be used to manage how instances are distributed across hardware, optimizing for low-latency or high-throughput workloads. If you have specific performance requirements, using Dedicated Hosts in combination with these features can provide the physical isolation and performance needed for your workloads. This planning ensures that your workloads perform optimally without being constrained by shared hardware resources.
One challenge when using Dedicated Hosts is the potential for idle capacity. Unlike EC2 instances, where unused capacity can be scaled down or terminated, Dedicated Hosts reserve a fixed amount of resources, even if not all of them are used. This can lead to wasted resources if your usage patterns fluctuate. To mitigate this, organizations need to carefully monitor utilization and adjust their host allocations as usage changes. Tools like CloudWatch and Cost Explorer can help track resource usage and identify inefficiencies, ensuring that you’re not paying for unused server capacity.
Cost accounting for Dedicated Hosts requires attention to both amortized costs and chargeback models. Dedicated Hosts are typically purchased with a one- or three-year commitment, and the cost of these hosts is spread across the term, similar to how Reserved Instances work. Amortized views in Cost Explorer and CUR help you understand the effective cost of a host over its lifecycle, allowing you to account for the full value of the commitment. Chargeback models, using tags or cost categories, enable you to allocate host costs to specific departments or teams within your organization, ensuring that costs are tracked and managed at the appropriate level.
Multi-account purchase and sharing strategies enable organizations to optimize their use of Dedicated Hosts. For example, an organization with multiple AWS accounts may reserve Dedicated Hosts in one central account and share the usage across member accounts. This strategy maximizes resource utilization by ensuring that the commitment is distributed across multiple teams, while still benefiting from the dedicated nature of the hosts. AWS Organizations allows for the sharing of host reservations, enabling flexibility and efficiency in managing reserved capacity across accounts.
Common pitfalls when using Savings Plans and Dedicated Hosts include overcommitting, mis-scoping Savings Plans to workloads, and idle hosts. Overcommitting to a Savings Plan can lock you into a high commitment that doesn’t match your actual usage, while mis-scoping may lead to a mismatch between the plan’s coverage and the actual instance types or services being used. Similarly, Dedicated Hosts can be underutilized if the organization’s workloads don’t consistently use the allocated physical server resources. These pitfalls underscore the importance of continuous monitoring, periodic reviews, and careful planning when committing to these resources.
When answering exam questions, it’s important to recognize that Savings Plans are about flexibility and cost optimization, while Dedicated Hosts are about isolation and compliance. If the question focuses on cost savings with flexibility to scale, Savings Plans are the answer. If the focus is on licensing, isolation, or physical resource control, the answer will likely point to Dedicated Hosts. Understanding the distinction between these two options ensures that you can select the right solution based on the specific needs of your workload and business.
The final checklist when working with Savings Plans and Dedicated Hosts involves three key actions: commit smartly, verify usage regularly, and adjust quarterly. By carefully planning your commitment, tracking your usage, and making necessary adjustments, you can ensure that you’re optimizing costs while maintaining the flexibility or control required by your workload. This approach to AWS cost optimization keeps your infrastructure agile, cost-effective, and well-aligned with business needs.